Questions for Buddhists Part 6

it's starting to take a suspicious direction...
However, the reason why Ahorasseya has persisted so far is probably because there is something within himself that must be clarified here by all means.
There is not enough role for me to resolve that problem, but when I say laid-back, I still “listen” first. Listen properly to the answers before “I think this way” and chew them up. I feel like it starts there.

I don't feel like there is a “misunderstanding of language” as Mr. Sato said in the previous answer. Here's what it says, and where Aborasetsu Yasha-sama takes it. I think there is a gap between what Aborasetsu Yasha-sama says and what we receive.

As for me, I don't really understand the “law of effect ignoring cause.”

“I don't know,” “I don't know,” “I don't know,” “I don't know,” or “ignore.”

It's a result of a causal relationship. If you look at it from the results, there is always a causal relationship.

The reason why Shakyamuni attained enlightenment was not “the law of effect ignoring cause,” but probably because of causality.
I realized that there were various causes, such as seeing life, old age, illness, and death, that I was struggling with penance, and that I had abandoned penance. It wasn't taught by anyone and I realized it (unscrupulous dugou), and at the same time, it may also be expressed that causation is the teacher.
Shakyamuni did not create enlightenment, and it was only because it existed before Shakyamuni that he was awakened by cause and effect. So enlightenment and awakening.

The relationship with anxiety is as I answered in the previous question. I don't know anything like Freemasonry...

If I had to say one last thing, maybe Buddhism is not saved by “understanding” but by “not understanding.”
It's not that “you don't know” is painful, and if you acknowledge that you “don't know,” you can live “without knowing” with excitement and excitement. If you say “I understand,” people become bored and stop walking.
Maybe you have to understand it, but if you understand it, then maybe that's not the case when it comes to Buddhism.
That's all, I'll say what I don't understand and close this answer. I'll leave the rest up to the masters.

It's not cool (it's cool), but it's fine whether it's Nobita soba or old somen, but it's just that there's a slight misalignment, so I'll be thrilled without stretching.
“Discussing only soba recipes (theory) Soba stretches (not living the facts) eat at last (be proven by facts)”
“I'm kneading around in my head, so let's stop kneading around in my head (logic) and continue to be confused (contradictory), and live with the facts.”
The only countermeasure for this is attaining enlightenment through meditation, isn't it?” Right now, you're pedaling your thoughts, which are not Somen's, as a theory. What's more, I'm just doing it, and it's like reading a recipe that I haven't put into practice or done. After all, that is probably the theory and theory at the stage where neither Somen ate buckwheat. It's already right in front of me.
So, don't hit the pedal of your mind anymore,
Pushing the factual pedal is ascetic practice.
Unless you stop “keeping on the thought pedal,” you won't begin your training.
The bow pedal is different in terms of philosophy and academic attitudes.
If you say “buckwheat must be growing anyway” or “it must be old somen anyway,” it probably won't taste good even if you talk about that before you eat it.
Buddhism is not about “arguing.”
Once again, as a result of getting on the pedal of arguing and thinking, you're getting farther and farther away from enlightenment, aren't you? I want them to have the power to see that.
When a thought occurs, is it an affliction, a good thing, or a bad thing attached to it?
On what basis do you say you are worried? Does this question bother you?
Six years of ascetic practice is wrong.
It just wasn't an ascetic practice.
Once you really understand the proper way to practice ascetic practices, it is time to attain Buddhism.
The original state of affairs has leapt past enlightenment or hesitation, as humans say.
There are always facts before our eyes before our thoughts.
You start by saying words.
Buddhism initially values facts.
You value words and thoughts, and you don't want to taste soba or somen forever.
People who value the facts have already finished eating soba and are paying for soba noodles.
well, go ahead. I'm sorry. That's great.
“Who sowed this buckwheat and who boiled it?”

Worship

Let's ask questions one at a time
Paying minimal respect and consideration to others is something I want to cherish, even on the internet.

well,
Who can decipher the beginning of the world?
Primitive Buddhism is stoically realistic, so they just say “don't think about what you don't understand.” No matter what the outcome is, it's a story that has nothing to do with us.

It's easy to understand why meditation was born. When Buddha was born, shortly after agriculture was established in India, people gained a stable life of cultivation and harvesting from an unstable lifestyle that maintained a balance of nature and power, such as hunting and gathering, but one prince had doubts about the fact that there was no change in human suffering, which was the cause, and eventually as a way to capture desires that people could not normally control
It means that it gave birth to meditation, attained enlightenment, and spread Buddhism

Also, it is ignorant to perceive good deeds, enlightenment, and happiness as afflictions.
The former are born only from the rational part, and the latter only from the emotional part. Buddhism doesn't teach you this kind of perception; instead, you notice it yourself.

We are unable to control the delusions and actions created by our afflictions, and we become stuck in the chain of suffering and are unable to escape. There's a mechanism there. In meditation, it's just about observing that mechanism through introspection
I know my own stupidity.

If you don't care about Buddhism that much, don't complain and try it out.

Gassho

Hola, I made up a story without permission again. What you're doing isn't hitting Ishibashi. I falsified the numerical values in the specification without permission and said, “I found a problem!” I'm just adding flirtatious. It's like being a yakuza, including a well-intentioned coercion saying, “If it's Hasunoha with a 99% response rate,” it's like being a yakuza.

> It's the law of effect that ignores cause
→It is an image of a chain that continues endlessly, with cause producing effect, and the effect becoming the next cause... Therefore, “no one, including the Buddha, mentioned whether cause came first or effect came first.” I'm just saying that even if you force yourself to draw a conclusion on something unobservable, it's just a delusion.
And it's also your decision that the present is an end. “If you talk about the world as a whole from a broad perspective, it's both cause and effect, and it's not something you can add black and white.”

> This countermeasure is to attain enlightenment through meditation, right
→I didn't say a word like that. Me and Mr. Tange are the type of monks who usually say not to meditate in that sense.
In the first place, the content of the word enlightenment is completely different between me, Mr. Tange, and you. So how do we perceive it? I usually answer with my mouth sour. In particular, Mr. Tange almost always writes only this.

> So who taught Buddha to meditate?
→ “By chance,” I realized the enlightenment of nirvana silence.
Meditation itself “in a broad sense” is a universal practice. If you become a monk, you will learn as a matter of course. I had 2 (all 3) mentors before I went to the penance forest. This story is more famous than the number of years of training.
However, since the Buddha did not create enlightenment, there are also stories about past Buddha.

> It is said that it is also possible to break free from causal relationships and the law of effect that ignores cause
→I didn't say a word like that. Rather, I am in the position that “Buddhist reincarnation must be read on the premise of selflessness,” so the content of liberation is completely different.

＞State of Enlightenment
→This is the expression my denomination hates the most

> When that happens ~ political propaganda
→If you learn honestly in the order in which you read the textbook, the answers from the teachers up until now will be accurate at the point of the Twelve Causes. Rather, if you do it in a good order, you won't stumble like this due to causal theory. I answered them in a good order and they probably wouldn't read it properly, but...

＞This number is called 6
Don't think of ancient Indian numbers as real numbers. The culture is fundamentally different from Japanese

This is Kawaguchi Hidetoshi. This is my humble answer to the question.

In the law of causality and causation, originally, there is no establishment of cause, relationship, or effect as an entity, self nature, or self phase.

Perhaps there is a possibility that cause, relationship, and effect have each been caught as if they were an entity.

Therefore, what I would definitely like to recommend is Ryuju Daishi's “Nemoto Nakasho” (middle discussion).

Starting with chapter 1, it is also explained how we should look at cause and effect.

Please try to learn and advance your understanding.

Kawaguchi Hidetoshi Gassho

“You guys are amazing monks who give 99.9% answers.”
“But I don't think anyone can answer my question correctly.”
That's what you're talking about.

It's not like you can do anything else.
Instead, I feel like I'm trying to have a sense of superiority by saying “you won't be able to answer” to Hasunoha's monk.

Isn't there a tendency to lower the value of others and try to improve oneself relatively?
This is an act of inferiority and vanity.

Everyone has an inferiority complex. Not just you, but everyone.
However, it is possible to turn feelings of inferiority into energy for effort and growth.

By the way, how did you feel about Master Tange's words?
Your teacher is telling you to eat soba.
For some reason... eating makes me happy as a person.

I'm hungry too. Today's lunch is “new somen” or soba.
well then...

　Hello. They gave me their names, so we went out with each other.
Yeah, it looks like you took a look at the link. But it seems like they didn't understand what I wrote.
The very idea of “someone going to the world of metaphysics” seems to me to be the result of a “misunderstanding of words.” Well, it seems that there is a misunderstanding of how to perceive the “world of metaphysics.”
Oh yeah, I wrote “Nice to meet you,” but when I reread it, it answered the first question. I'm sorry I forgot. Back then, there was more time between questions, but it seems that this custom of “interpreting and doing your own research” has disappeared recently. Something within you seems to have changed. Do you have any idea?
Also, I don't know if they are demeaning, but no matter how much you refute your nonsense, I don't think it will save your opponent. In fact, interest in you has declined, in my case. In other words, well, it's boring.
Maybe it's a story linked to late stage bitogen around here.
Tonight's hot pot sauce was excellent. But I can't eat rice just because of the sauce. It was a feast.

appending
Oh, you read it, didn't you? Thank you very much. Ked, I don't really understand what you're saying right now. I'll think about it for a moment.