Buddhism is not Buddha's teaching.
I'm examining human truth under the name Mutou Genji on novel submission sites such as Kakuyom.
For the time being, I understood that the human truth I had arrived at was close to the Buddha.
Buddha is still sweet, though.
So I asked a question.
The Buddha doesn't teach after death or anything like that, does he?
It explained the way for humans to live as human beings.
He was explaining how to live.
It's a way to live, isn't it?
But if you sing nembutsu, it's Atara Kotara.
It's paradise, it's pure land.
Doesn't this make too much of a fool of Buddha's teachings or Buddha by leaving behind the delusion that old high priests traveled due to lack of nutrition and lack of sleep? Buddhism in general.
If the Buddha were alive, I would drop it to the level of spanking and punching followers of Buddhism, and I would make a fool of the Buddha's teachings.
Isn't it really training that you don't think about anything so much that you don't even notice it?
People all over the place are in a state of enlightenment.
From Einstein to Miyamoto Musashi, and now Ichiro, if they don't do well, Egashira 2:50.
There's a high possibility that they were also serial killers in the olden days.
I just thought that only good people could do it because the Buddha is half-hearted.
I've reached it myself, too.
OK?
I want to know why they use the word enlightenment even though it's impossible to attain enlightenment by doing anything in Buddhism.
