hasunoha

Assuming there was simultaneous euthanasia gas all over the world

 This is a radical proposition, a thought experiment, and my desire.
My desire is for all kinds of life to die out in an instant, and at the same time, without any suffering. I am truly disappointed in this world, and I strongly desire a break away from the substance called the body. I can't help but want to let go of my five senses and not feel anything.
Even if you commit suicide, as long as this world exists, you cannot escape the possibility of being born again. I despaired of that, and began to hope for “nothing.”

There is a part where I think humans have evolved to this point just to develop “global simultaneous euthanasia gas.”
Other than the fact that some people will seize the right to live and kill all lives, end lives that continue naturally by artificial means, and the fact that no one has said such a thing until now, isn't my proposal the same as the extinction of the Sun coming in the distant future and the salvation that Amida brings?

I don't see any hope anywhere other than “it doesn't exist.”
The instinct of life lies in violating others. Not only are humans not escaping that instinct, but it is an age where others are excluded based on the desire to “take care of oneself.”
Until now, a lot of suffering that has been made to look like they are doing something good by pretending not to see it has erupted under the terms “diversity” and “human rights,” and the result is a reproduction of more suffering than ever before.

Goodwill is originally nothing but a relic of mythology.
A society cannot exist without sacrificing something.
If so, I can only think that it would be better to delete everything.

If “Total Life Simultaneous Euthanasia Gas” is wrong, what should I do
Is that good?

5 Zen Responses

What are you writing here for

Hello.

Your writing is generally structured with assertions and conclusions.

First, ask yourself a question.
After writing the question here, I wonder if I am prepared in my heart to respect the answers and think of them as meaningful.

The teacher who answered last time introduced me about the Buddha and said that this world is “unnecessary to despair.” In response to this, you wrote in your reply that “even when it was said that the Buddha was enlightened, the times were too different and didn't come right,” and you were “convinced that you would come to the conclusion that all kinds of living things should not exist” with your own “reason.”

What are you writing here for?

Shouldn't we first take enough time to consider the respondents' advice as meaningful? What's more, the field of Buddhism is a field that cannot be fully learned even after spending a lifetime. To dismiss it in one word. Aren't you lacking in humility about your own lack of insight? Isn't there not enough respect for the other person?

They don't give in to their opinions, and they have no respect for their opponents.

What the hell am I trying to do here? You probably don't understand yourself.

Your root problem is that you don't know what you're trying to do for yourself.

“Gas” is a problem from before.

I read your thoughts

I read it.
I imagine that you are being forced to do so much and that you are struggling to live. You may be living in the throes of hell just like you are right now. I don't know the details of your thoughts, suffering, and worries, but I think you're in a situation where you think that way.

Why don't you write what you want right now in letters? How would you feel? And what about plans and ideas like that?

There's no need to hurry; I think it's okay to look at your future without thinking about it.

I don't think it's useless for you to think like that. There are various twists and turns in our lives, and we also run into things we can't do or can't do anything about.

There are times when you are keenly aware that you cannot accept anything that is not recognized at all, including yourself.
Everything, everything, disappear! There are times when I think that. There are times when I hate myself, hold a grudge against people, and want to curse everything around me and destroy everything.

And what you're thinking right now isn't something you can keep thinking about forever. You might be thinking about something else the next moment. Everything changes and changes.

It dies moment by moment due to the toxic gas called time

Our mind floats and disappears moment by moment, so “I” is being reborn as a new self every moment.
Honen Shonin said that each person has 840 million thoughts in a day.
If you compare the mind to a film, a 24-hour video is made from 84,000 frames of images.
Therefore, there is also a one-frame “you” who simply inhale and exhale air.
Of course, there are also “you” moments that kill other lives.
Even if it leads to a new scene where you're reborn, or the next frame, most of the frames are peaceful scenes where you're just breathing in and out air.
Also, since we are created and destroyed moment by moment, we die every moment even if we don't inhale toxic gas.
Since they have inherited stored data, they only have the illusion that they are the same person, and in fact, they are replaced by different people every moment.
Even if you don't die from poison gas, you only need to notice that “all living things have already continued to die every second.”
There is already a toxic gas called time.

After all, euthanasia that the person himself does not want is negative sharing, seeking true good intentions, sharing

It's a thought experiment, so feel free to think otherwise.
In experiments, if you cause trouble to others, there will be victims, so it's OK if you experiment so as not to cause trouble to others. It would be nice if this experiment also blossomed as a process.
It's a pity that everyone gets mad at me, so I'll follow up.
If possible, please proceed with that experiment and give me further answers to “❞ ways for all kinds of life to live comfortably ❝ without any suffering.”
Potassium cyanide is also necessary for metal plating. If you use it in terrorism, it's insane. If nuclear weapons are also used as weapons, people will die. A lot of people would be saved by turning it into electricity at a nuclear power plant.
Your ab-nay 💀 idea is also such that you can only find a way to use scissors as a weapon, and if you don't turn into ambition or a sense of bodhi to improve humanity, everyone will fall into bad thoughts due to negative sharing.
It is only when one is truly disappointed in this world that one should awaken the Bodhisattva Heart.
If you want “nothing,” you should break “yes” in your brain.
Once upon a time, there was a person called the “Patriarch.”
Mori Ogai, a genius monk who obtained a certificate of approval from the Rinzai Soto sect and entered the University of Tokyo at age 12, is also a highly acclaimed genius monk. His collection of answers to public proposals was also distributed overseas, and Hirosachiya also translated them.
In order to destroy all “having,” it is enough to destroy the “having” within oneself.
Shakyamuni and Daigo have already completed the development of “Worldwide Simultaneous Euthanasia Gas,” which is harmless to humans and animals.
The world is “Yuishin-zou.”
Your grand fantasies and visions are only limited to the middle of Noble Prince's head. The heart touches relationships, touches things, imagines them, creates them, and leads to this.
There is no need to make a fuss about the extinction of the Sun coming in the distant future or the salvation of Amida until that time. If it's Hill now, it will determine tomorrow's Yol, and I have doubts about how to live a way of life that spoils the light underfoot, wondering if it's still there.
If life's instincts infringe on others, why don't you slay yourself with a sharp sword that can't even save that bug of your own. A sword that doesn't let me rule over itself is a sword of wisdom that makes you notice that other beings also have a desire to “take care of yourself.”
Since “diversity” and “human rights” are used maliciously, our human rights and diversity are attacked. So we need to fix it. Even though I am misunderstood as netoyo, I am breaking the diversity of bashibashi and lies and the human rights of lies. Since good intentions are misused maliciously, they cause strange public opinion to develop like left-wingers in Japan. It would be like a naive monk being tempted by a malicious activist. If you can't read the direction that leads to mythology, you're just reading good intentions with malice.

It's a part of the character limit... but I've omitted it, sorry.

I also read the previous questions etc. I would appreciate it if you could listen to it as one opinion.

Society cannot be formed without sacrificing something, eliminating others in accordance with the desire to cherish oneself, the existence of the sin of existence, and gratitude for being born are lacking. I think so too. I'm just pretending not to see the inconvenient truth that living is evil. I can't deny it. When I watch TV (especially now), I also think that only lucky people can live (although this is different from the nuance in your sentences).

Still, I would like to say that “all-life simultaneous euthanasia gas” is wrong. Before that, I'd like to ask you, if good intentions aren't a myth, can the existence of good intentions be “hope other than “not existing” for you?

There is a teaching called “sky” in Mahayana Buddhism. According to that, there is no good or evil in this world. This is because they are concepts created by people (sentient beings). Certainly, there is no way for good or evil to exist in a world without definers and observers. However, humans have coined such words (even though Buddhism does not mention the conflict between good and evil or anything similar). Let's say there was no good in this world. So how can we invent the concept of evil? You're using the word evil. You know what evil is. I think this is because they have experienced goodness and good intentions in the past. I don't think living things that have experienced nothing but evil can recognize and conceptualize evil.
And above all, reading previous posts, etc., I have no doubt that you have good intentions as well as malice. To me, I don't think there are good intentions among people who look for a reason to break away from the status quo, become depressed, assume mistakes in their own wishes, and ask others for opinions. If good intentions can be hope for life, and if we assume that the absence of hope affirms death, I deny “all-life simultaneous euthanasia gas.” This is because, in accordance with the foregoing, I am convinced that there is good intentions within you. Because “all life” includes you.

However, it's not an answer to questions and answers, etc. including the last sentence that Utsuro imagined most wanted to hear, and the previous question. I couldn't answer it. I'm sorry.
I don't understand even 10% of your suffering. Nevertheless, there are good intentions in the world, because you have good intentions. I want to make you say that.