On women's social advancement and intelligence

It says that they were hit by Kotenpan last time, but the monks were kind enough to respond to the impressions I saw.
You are free to do what you think.
It's just subjective, but I felt that I wanted you to think about it in your head.

I learned in elementary school science that men have big brains.
So I remember my teacher telling me that men are superior to women.

One thing I'm wondering is, if you have a small brain or low intelligence, it's suitable for raising children.
Doesn't brain size matter? It makes me think.
Erasmus University doesn't say that women are suited to raising children, nor is it written that women aren't suited to work.
I was hoping there would be an explanation for that.

As you said, I certainly think history was created by men.
Even if you look at historical figures, they're all men.
However, well, I think times have changed.

It is true that women do the job well, but there are probably many people who have to work even if they don't like it.
Having to work no matter what, is an issue faced not only by women, but by both men and women.
However, no matter how hard women try, they still don't get paid as much as men, and as you might think, it's a male-dominated world.

For now, why don't you ask your wife to talk about Erasmus University and make an effort to convince her?
They say they want as many as 3 children.
I pray that Japan's declining birthrate can be solved even a little bit.

In the linked article, as a result of research by Erasmus University, it is simply “found that men are about 4 points superior to women in intelligence and 14% larger in brain size.” That's all there is to it.

In this article, in addition to “women get good results on memory tests,” “women tend to have a better vocabulary (women tend to have a better vocabulary)” “women's brains are small (compared to men), but the connections between brain cells are quite good and function quickly (women's brains are difficult but could perform more quickly) It also says “because of better connections between brain cells.)”

Therefore, it can be said that there is no “scientific proof” at all in this article that women are not suited to work or that they cannot do difficult things.

In the first place, being a full-time housewife or househusband is a great job, even though they have joined the family. Do you even think that social work = difficult = can't be done by women, and that home work = easy = anyone can do it?

It seems that women are afraid to come out into society, or that they are worried that women won't become what they say, and they have decided that “women should be like this.” Women close to you who come into contact with such opinions will have a tough time.

I think it is also an extreme opinion that “it is most economical and rational for women to be forced by law to give birth to children and bind them to the home,” but as a result of thinking about “economic” things, there are many situations where women think “rationally” and are forced to return to society because they are uneasy about income if they leave the household.
* Of course, there are places where people work together even in families without anxiety about income, and there are also people who don't want to go out into society even if they have anxiety. It's probably something we should discuss on a case-by-case basis in that household.

What is important is to respect the other person (woman) as a person who also has will, feelings, desires, and claims, and I don't think it is absolutely necessary to impose an assertion that you think this way.

There are probably enough words out, so just a little bit.

Questions like this because I'm not sure about your own words
I think it will come out.

In other words, I am suffering from “not being myself.”

You haven't even become a man yourself.
It would be nice if you worked hard as a “man.”
There will be no need to insist on your wife to “put him in the family.”

Let's just say it's all about not fulfilling one's function as a man.
In other words, this question arises because you haven't become a “man.”

First, let's be a “man” with confidence in yourself.
Then you don't have to “ask” your wife.

An old man should act as an old man and with confidence.

What supports that is the thing called “a man's worth.”

To you, to your uncle. to your child. good luck, good luck.

I've also read about the university's research results, spatial recognition, and language skills in the book.
However, these are just strengths and weaknesses, and I don't think it can be applied to “work in general.” All you have to do is find a job where you can make the most of your strengths. (Of course, men have poor language skills, so I'm not saying it's better not to get a job related to that.)
Why don't you read Kurokawa Ihoko's book about gender differences? First of all, I think it's full of hints for “I don't know my wife.”
To be honest, I don't agree with “women have gone to great lengths to create them.” They nod so much that “you should make use of your own characteristics.” However, I clearly disagree with the value “work (such as a company) is more valuable than raising children,” which I feel from this whole perspective. Didn't your mother raise you too?
Well, if you and your wife agree on those values, I'm not asking you to change them.

appending
I also talked about management, but I changed some of my original answers.
I wrote and read the “thank you” column. You are free to think so, but I think it's better not to show it off to your wife or mother. If it's a trial and error of thought, I don't understand it, but when I think about beliefs or conclusions, I presume that neither my wife nor my family can be happy.
Your starting point must have been “I don't know my wife.” You earned money at the company, what did you do with it, and what did you think you would do? Do you end up earning money, and you?

Further additions
I read it at the end of the “thank you” section. So isn't she clearly your victim? because you became pregnant and gave birth to your child? That's different. I'm a victim of your stubborn thoughts. As I wrote in the previous question, this kind of thing is an opportunity to expand your values and grow as a married couple. She probably doesn't want to work as hard as before either. What makes you think “I was an idiot for believing that person” is just pathetic as a man?
(This is almost an overlap, so I'll cut it off)

postscript.
Whoa, I wrote “there is a difference,” but I haven't written “therefore which one is superior in total.” Same as the paper you gave at the beginning. I'm saying, “By knowing each other's differences, your worries will decrease.”

Okuta

If it becomes the society you want... choosing a spouse is a matter of life and death for women. In addition to height and annual income, there will be an item called “brain weight” on the marriage hunting entry sheet. We are looking for capable men with big brains who are strong and will never get sick, who are lucky and are absolutely not suited to unexpected accidents.

When it becomes such a society, do you have confidence that you are the man chosen by women?
Will it rank high? At least, my wife said, “After all, I want to marry you!” Do you have confidence that you can say that??

If you're confident in your correctness, there's no need to try to prove it. You don't need to ask people for consent. People who agree with your ideas will gather. Women will also gather to say that their thoughts are wonderful.

What should we do about boys with infertility such as azoospermia when it becomes the society we want? If they become unable to work due to illness or accident after marriage, or if they are unable to have children, will they offer their wife to another man? No, for women, marriage is a matter of life and death, so they won't take care of you and will abandon you and go to another man's place.

People are looking for happiness. Preserving species is just like animals. What does it mean to be human? It is the reason humans seek value beyond the preservation of species. There are many women who work hard and take care of their husbands who are sick and unable to work. It is a realization of the highest value that only humans can do. Wouldn't you want it to be like that if you were a married couple??

If you're only looking for logic that can prove right, win arguments, and let women do what they want, then Buddhism is weak. This is because the Buddha says that philosophical debates are meaningless. Buddhism peacefully explains how to be free from suffering and be happy. There is a logic that monotheistic religions are resistant to controversy and conquer for the sake of “justice.”

Please improve your man and become a big, strong man in the true sense of the word. Big is the size of a pocket that can cover differences in value. Please become a man your wife can choose again when it becomes the society you want. Before that, I hope your actual “current” family life will go well. Senryu

I'll write about business administration in a bland manner. What is the determination diagram for individual performance

p=F (I, M, S)

That's it. I is individual differences (personality, ability, knowledge, experience, biological nuclear characteristics), M is motivation, and S is situation.
It is completely unreasonable to take up only abilities and bionuclear features and not discuss motivations and situations.

Liberalism and human rights are originally about creating a fair society to prevent losing opportunities for excellent human resources to be promoted due to differences in birth (equalizing opportunities in order to stably appoint irregulars) and maximizing motivation, so let's strengthen our country! That's the idea. In the first place, it is not a charitable activity; it is based on a rational strategy aimed at maximizing p=F (I, M, S). It's ironic that human rights activists are so misunderstood, though.

Let's think about how to raise not only I but also M and S factors. A society bound by law and forced to do it declined because it lost its competitiveness in that respect, both in terms of historical facts and academics. Sometimes, “don't say crap, do it!!!” This attitude is also important, but acquiring the ability to show understanding and be close to others and increasing withdrawals is a trick to becoming excellent managers, managers, and heads of families who continue to bring out organizational performance for a long period of time.

rewrite
Women, like women workers in the textile industry, began advancing into society during the Meiji period. My grandmother left the Normal School before and during the war and was busy working as a teacher and making military uniforms. Typists, telephone operators, and flight attendants were female professionals admired by women at the time. The period leading up to the period of high economic growth was the period when the gender equality movement flourished the most.
In other words, the trend of women advancing into society occurred during the period when there was momentum in Japan.
And the wife from the rural fishing village has been working hard from the feudal era until today.
Let's learn from the olden days. The fact that women were forced into homes in the past is half a historical view of redemption.

Please read this article too
https://healthpolicyhealthecon.com/2016/12/19/physician-gender-and-patient-mortality/

About p = I wrote it in a roundabout way in a social context so as not to upset my nerves, but I'm just writing it as about myself. My theme is that if you don't become a person who can consistently show understanding from the last time, people's minds will just drift away

　No matter what you think, it's personal freedom, so I won't deny it. It's not men who can work; you're the one who can do the work. If you can work under any circumstances, I think that's fine. There are various types of men, so I can't say it unequivocally.
The research results are only about the size of the brain, so I don't really understand it. No scientific answers have been obtained from the sentences after the research results, so I would like a conclusion to prove it.
① Can we prevent the declining birthrate if the fertility rate of women increases? I don't think it's just because women work separately for the reason they don't give birth. I wonder if there are men who can increase the birth rate. Aren't there more men who don't want to get married?
② Even if men make it, don't women consume more? No matter how much good things are used for men, it will eventually be wasted if women who consume them do not have the motivation to buy.
③ Good women can be irregular, which means they do general work such as tea pans, photocopiers, receptionists, and phone calls. Ideas and creations are done by men, so I wonder if they aren't necessary?
Reminds me of Kosetsu Minami's “Kanpaku Declaration.” What you say makes sense, but the world seems to have become a bigger trend, and it seems that there are things that cannot be prevented or prevented. However, no matter what you think of women, please treat people who do housework for your house, people who produce food, clothing, and shelter for you, and people who follow up on your work with a feeling of gratitude. Please don't forget to hold on to this. Being thankful is free.