What is an affliction that should be destroyed
I often go to conveyor belt sushi, so I have a question about what I noticed there.
What is affliction?
“Worry is suffering (Ducca)”
Now that's it, I'd like to dig a little deeper, but I'm assuming that “greed” is necessary for survival, and if you don't satisfy this, you can't maintain your body's life, and that fundamental desires such as “appetite” and “desire to sleep” are not worries.
Buddha didn't deny this either (if he denied it, he died before making disciples. (Some disciples had their eyes crushed due to lack of sleep).
Next is “thirst,” and I think this is associated with hearts (feelings) such as “sexual desire,” joy, anger, sorrow (emotions that animals have), and mercy and devotion (good deeds), etc., which are not necessary for maintaining one's own life.
At first, “greed” was also included in “thirst,” but I began to think that there would be no survival and peace without thinking about it separately.
Now, it comes down to what “affliction” is, and I think “obsession” is attached to “greed” and “thirst.”
And afflictions are divided into “infatuation,” “insanity,” and “insanity,” respectively.
“Obsession” alone does not become “annoyance” if there is no host (desire or thirst) that parasitizes on it. However, obsession has the potential to stick to everything, and I think everything can become trouble.
In other words, I began to wonder if anxiety lies in how unattached they are.
Now I'm going to talk about conveyor belt sushi at the beginning,
1. I was really hungry, so I went outside to eat. I found conveyor belt sushi, so I went in and ate it moderately.
2. I was really hungry, so I went outside. I really wanted to eat conveyor belt sushi, so I ate conveyor belt sushi in moderation.
Number 1 is not worry because it only satisfies appetite, and number 2 is worry because it is obsessed with appetite.
Using the same analogy,
1. Volunteers sent relief supplies to disaster-stricken areas.
2. I volunteered to send relief supplies to the disaster area, but I was sad because I thought my strength wasn't enough.
Both are acts carried out due to great sorrow, but the second one is troubling because an obsession with not being enough has arisen.
Monks destroy the feelings animals have in their petty desires and thirst, so that they don't get attached to mercy and kisatsu and spend their time without being disturbed, and housekeepers don't need to destroy lust and thirst, but they don't have to become attached.
By the way, I didn't understand the twelve lucky signs at all, so I thought about it based on my experiences from the Four Sisterns and Hachishodo.
Please give me advice.
