hasunoha

Do all the monks sympathize 100% with this site?

“Nice!” Try “thank you,” and try leading to Facebook and Twitter to “tell Shaba this question and answer.”
It's a bad way to say it, but it smells like an image.

As for most of the questions, I think “I don't think I need to ask the monk anything...”
It would be fine for a monk to answer, but wouldn't someone who has had a close experience with the questioner be able to give a more useful answer? There are only things that make me think.

Even though it's not a big answer, I feel that most of the questioners are deceived by excessive expectations and fantasies about the job called a “monk,” and they are often more grateful than necessary.
Especially when I look at the hot-blooded answers, I wonder what...

Isn't this kind of site making people move away from the essence of religion?

There seems to be a benefit involved, so there may be no answers, but I wanted to hear the true intentions of the monks, so I would like to ask you a question.

7 Zen Responses

Yes.

All of the responses here are volunteers, and they don't get paid at all. It's also a place of study for me.
A monk who agreed with Mr. Horishita's idea of “being kind to Japan,” who launched this site, answered. I am one of them. This kind of “question and answer” format is the same as the “waiting sermon” performed by the Buddha, and I think it is well suited to Buddhism.
http://taka.hasunoha-blog.info/start/

Please don't hesitate to ask if you have any questions of your heart.

Those who can listen are the way to be saved

I don't think all of the questioners were satisfied with the answers. I'm not trying to give a comfortable answer.
What is religion? What is Buddhism? What is salvation? What is myself? I'm just choosing words and conveying how the essence of such things can be conveyed.

What is unmistakable from anyone's point of view is truth, Buddhism. What changes depending on how people perceive it is their way of thinking. If it's something that can be solved with a way of thinking and perception, there's no problem. However, people are troubled because they cannot solve it with their way of thinking or perception. The enlightenment that the Buddha realized was an awakening to an infinitely realistic fact. When you let go of all your obsessions and forget your own existence, only the real thing remains. That's why I feel safe. Since there are no unparticular value judgments, people can spend their time with peace of mind.

Since it is a teaching that forgives everything without imposing values on people, everyone can probably live with peace of mind.
Anyone can be saved if they do it.

The Buddha said.
“Don't look at what others did or didn't do. Look at what you did and didn't do.”
I just write my best answers, that's all.
I hope something encouraging for the person who asked the question.
That's all.
Of course, it is also true that there are negative monks. However, I think it will become increasingly necessary in the coming era.
It seems that the number of questions is currently limited, so I hope the number of monks who answer more will increase until there is no limit.

100%? I haven't thought about it.

Nah, I saw your question and asked myself that for the first time. “Do I 100% sympathize with this site?” That's right.
Basically, I sympathize, or rather agree with it. But “is it 100%?” ... I'm sure that's not the case. At the same time, “What is the meaning of whether you are 100% sympathetic or not?” I also discovered that I didn't understand. I was made aware of that.
By the way, what kind of answer is “hot-blooded”? From your point of view, of course.
later. “Get away from the essence of religion”... what kind of experiences do you think people should have in order to get closer to the essence of religion? If possible, I'd like you to make suggestions. I wonder if they want to say “no over the internet”? I can imagine that.

I read it.
We would like to hear your opinions and take them seriously.
As you said, I think there are people who think they don't need to listen to the boy's opinions at all.
However, I want to save people through Buddhism through this place, and I want them to live properly.
I'm also an immature person, and even though I'm useless, I keep thinking that there is something I can do to help even a little bit.

After all, there are many people in the world who have been plagued by various misfortunes due to bad relationships. Even in such circumstances, I hope I can help even just a little bit.

I sincerely hope that many people will be saved by the wisdom and mercy of the Buddha and that they will survive healthy and happy.

Hasunoha is in the process of being made by everyone

This is Kawaguchi Hidetoshi. This is my humble answer to the question.

I sympathize with my ambitions, and I am participating and responding completely as a volunteer.

When it comes to whether empathy is 100% or not, then that's not the case.

There is also a place where everyone can give their own opinions and suggestions on management. Thus, hasunoha is also in the process of being created by everyone.

As “everything is lucky and empty,” it is something that is made up of cause and effect. Of course, hasunoha, questions, answers, and the internet are similarly impossible as entities.

I hope Hasunoha will become even better due to good causes and relationships.

Kawaguchi Hidetoshi Gassho

Even though I can't 100% empathize with myself or my parents

Hmm... how many spaces are there in this world that I can 100% sympathize with? Tell me the major Q&A! Goo and Yahoo! It's about the wisdom bag and Komachi's remarks. How does it compare to those? That relative evaluation is probably everything. It's nothing more than a begging complaint.

When I answered social media, the tweet that went viral was Yahoo! I was checking them one by one in real time, but well, everyone paid a lot of attention to the greed sensor and game nature. No, it's not where it matters! That's it.
But among them, there are only a few Hong's, and they say, “Right! Is that what it means to have no worries! I didn't have that idea!” There was also a response.

It's called one-and-a-half acceptance, and I think it makes sense to respond if there is one or a half people with the qualifications to grasp the essence in this way.

> Wouldn't someone who had a close experience with the questioner be able to give more useful answers?

This is probably true. I think so too. However, listening to disasters is evident in volunteering and funeral sites, etc., and there are many people who say, “It was painful not being able to tell anyone about this trouble for a long time, but I was only able to tell the monk.”

It's easy to be misunderstood, but most people who talk to monks don't come to listen to deep religious stories; they want monks to listen to their own stories. This is also written carefully in the textbook of the missionary training school of my denomination. If you swallow that reality and then think about how to convey Buddhism on that playing field, Buddhism will only belong to a handful of parishioners. It would be difficult for people who don't understand that to be convinced.

No profit... rather, these people are sponsoring Hasunoha tens of thousands of yen a year (was it support money?) that's because they paid for it to answer, right? I haven't paid though. It's optional, too.
It's easy to misunderstand that, but hasunoha is just a platform, and we, the answering monks, are guests just like the questioner. The connection between me and the operator is to the extent that we have spoken on the phone 3 or 4 times to allow the use of answers on TV or in books.

Even so, I don't think it would be heartless if I knew about the operator who worked steadily between jobs as an individual activity and raised Hasunoha to this point while having huge deficits, and still can't feel anything.