Does choosing the path of ascetic practice prioritize oneself over the weak in society?
(I understand that this is not the case for all denominations) This is a question about how zazen meditation paves the way to enlightenment. Decades of ascetic practice and zazen meditation may certainly be a step towards enlightenment for that monk.
However, in the meantime, there are many people in developing countries who don't know if they can even live that day. There are poor people in Japan as well. If you take the hand of those people instead of doing zazen meditation, if they give them bread, and if they consider a way to survive together, there will be plenty of lives that can be saved.
Have you ever thought that the path of ascetic practice (especially the act of cutting off from society for a long period of time) means choosing and prioritizing yourself in a sense? (This isn't an insult; it's a level of real doubt. Please understand that I'm not saying it in a really, really bad sense)
I think that feeling of concentrating on my own path is wonderful. Also, I feel like I'm trying to pass on what I've gained to people around me. However, in this real society, if it is important to “become a person who illuminates a corner,” as Buddhism says in the Tendai sect, is it wrong to feel that this is somewhat contradictory?
As monks, what do you think Buddhism can do in front of people who don't know they can get through today due to poverty, hunger, etc., regardless of whether they are in developing countries or developed countries?
