hasunoha

Having an excellent extramarital child for each couple

First of all, I apologize first that consultations that deviate from such public values come into contact with the eyes of other people.

“Is it ego for each couple to create excellent extramarital children?”

I have a fiancé. She is a beautiful woman who is a model, influencer, and polyamorous (loves multiple people at the same time).

She said she would like to have a child of Scandinavian descent when she gets married, and I welcome that too. Also, I told her that I would like to have children from a Russian woman, and I got her approval. The reason I want a half-Russian child is because my mother is a Russian quarter.
I can love her kids and she'll love mine too. And we love each other ourselves.

She knows how easy it is for a beautiful woman to live. If you look good, people will always favor you, and it's easy to gain an advantage in a competitive society. That's why I always say I want to give birth to half a beautiful woman who fits Western values.

I'm not a good-looking guy in common, but I've covered my studies, work, etc. with my efforts, so I can understand what she says as an evaluation axis. (Incidentally, the reason I don't want her kids is because she herself says she doesn't have the confidence to give birth to a cute baby.)

It's unavoidable to be called eugenics, lookism, or meritocracy,
Intelligence can be managed depending on education, but as a matter of fact, it is inherited to some extent, and I believe that appearance is definitely inherited.

I am seriously aware that it is not in line with current values, but there are also cases in China where designer babies were created by genetic manipulation, such as in the movie “Gataka.”

Is it your ego as a parent that makes excellent children?

I've been researching capitalism since I was in college, and I'm disappointed with this world where people say “it's easier to think about the end of the world than the end of capitalism.”

In a world affected by the disease capitalist realism since birth, I believe that appearance, connections, economic strength, education, and geographical advantage are necessary to win the game called neoliberalism.

If you're going to give birth to a new person in this distorted world that can't be saved, I think it's better to have a good appearance and a clear brain. If you don't want anti-natalism, I think this is the only way.

4 Zen Responses

Fill it with compassion

Yakisoba-sama

The content of the previous consultation and the content of this time is such an egotistical content that I don't think they are the same person. Last time I snuggled up to a lot of people and helped them, but I wasn't satisfied. There was such a thing. After the consultation, it was said that things had improved, so they were probably satisfied with something.
But this time, I think it can be said that the content is swirling with desire, whether it was too satisfying or still not enough?
The person who snuggled up and helped said that my child is an excellent kid...

I wonder what “life” is.
I wonder what “exiting” means.
And I wonder what to do when it comes to “loving” and “being satisfied.”
Furthermore, if they are supposed to be excellent children, when they are born with some kind of disability,
What will happen to your thoughts?
Furthermore, if you suddenly find cancer, etc., and you have little life expectancy
What kind of feelings do you have?

Wouldn't it be nice in this distorted world where there is no way to save them (this is a world where you look selfish), regardless of their appearance, who honestly, kindly smiles around them, and fills them with compassion?

I think so.

Is it better to have more values? Is it the other way around?

First of all, it's something I wanted to talk about out of anger, so I hope you can forgive me for being rude here and there.

Thinking “I want to leave excellent genes to my children” is probably another form of kindness.
That's understandable.
Many people will be able to understand this, so I think the rest will be a matter of degree.

“Leave an excellent child behind”
If it's a wild beast, this is an advantageous strategy.
This is because there are few types of abilities required, and selection is easy.
You probably know how diverse the concept of “excellence” in human society is and how many abilities are required, but it is true that the neoliberal world is close to the wild, so it may also be possible to select excellence.

Certainly, if what you say goes through, your kids don't even need to draw your blood, and they actually do that with your fiancé.
I think it's great that it's consistent.

But if that's the case, you don't have to be the one to raise them.
No matter how good you are, as expected, you still shouldn't be the greatest father in the world, so you should outsource child-rearing, right?

In other words, regardless of whether you're likely not the best person for a child, you want the person who becomes your child to be the best person possible.
In this respect, you could say that you are an ego.
But ego is fine too.
If you're prepared to bear bad reviews, there's nothing you can't do in this world.

If you're doing research on capitalism,
As a result of everyone taking “rational actions as individuals,” the phenomenon of going in a bad direction as a group has probably been observed many times, but well, until your child survives, someone else will maintain society to the extent that your child advantage is protected.

Also, if my understanding of anti-natalism is correct, I don't think I can even refute it if I don't feel joy in “being born” and “being alive.”
I feel like it doesn't matter if you have a clear brain or a pretty appearance

No matter who they are, it's better for parents not to be too much of a protagonist even before their child is born

Kids are just like you.
You have will and intention.
Wouldn't it be sad if it was a life controlled by a parent's ego, or if the parent's ego still manipulated the direction the mind progresses?
This is what I want as a child.
I want my kids to do this.
I feel that this is actually an attitude that ignores dignity, whether it is disrespectful to children's lives and the dignity of children.
It is difficult to prepare gifted education from a small age, or for parents to try to enter the entertainment industry by preparing skills with their parents' ego, or being made to sit in the position of children who are not loved unless they are conditioned as pure parents and children. Not feeling sad is probably even saddest, so if you don't feel any discomfort, it's about looking back at the relationship between you and your parents and what is a “parent and child.” What is the dignity of parents? What is a child's dignity? What is ego? What is a child's pure right to life? How far should parents go to encourage their children? I think it's a good idea for parents to think carefully about “how far” they can go with their children.
Also, it is prejudice that that value is only for you, that the world is like this, and that today's world has such values. Your own unique way of thinking. It's your own sense of value. I want them to be able to see through that very well. I think it would be a good idea to impose that on your child at this point. If there's something you want or desire to be out “if you're not in a state,” don't you have an “attitude” equivalent to a petite death sentence for those children? What if someone who has the same thoughts as you looks at you and makes the same decisions for you? The world, which is actually difficult to live in, will continue to grow and amplify.
Is Fukuoka Masanobu a Japanese hermit named Sama? A religious philosopher says:
It takes ten unbeautiful women to make one beautiful woman.
The idea is that only beautiful women have special rights, and the rest is probably the idea that they are beautiful and out.
Then, let's say you've “won or won” with that neoliberalism and the unique world you set up. Who is judging them as winning? Let's look like parents raising children with their egos bare and still imposing parents' values on children using your child as food. Isn't the real winner human nature that overcomes such cold values?

Everyone has an ego

The ego is like the parent of everyone's afflictions.
Distinguishing one's own child from someone else's is ego in itself.
Of course, children also have egos, and they may worry about comparing themselves to others.
How do you explain to your child when they learn about the circumstances of their birth in the future?
Basically, children will want to live with their parents.
I'm worried about what happens when I think about children's feelings.
Also, no matter how good and healthy your parents are, there is a possibility that you will be born with an illness or disability.
If it's a public elementary school, the probability that 1 or 2 people in the class have some kind of disability is conceivable.
At that time, are you and your marriage partner prepared to raise them responsibly?
I'm worried if I'll be able to clear them.
Well, if it's not an illegal act, it's free, but as an answer to the question of whether it's ego, it's ego.
Most of what humans do is probably ego.