What does it mean to quiet Nanmu Amida Buddha
My family is a member of the Jodo sect.
The Jodo sect (I think the Jodo Shinshu sect is the same) understands the idea that “if you just chant Namu Amida Buddha, when you die, Amida will appear and take you to the Pure Land, where you will gain enlightenment and be saved.”
However, no matter what, it leaves a haze in my heart.
I think “if you sing Namu Amida Buddha, you will be taken to the Pure Land, and you will gain enlightenment (= you will be saved),” it will mean that “people who don't sing Namu Amida Buddha will not attain enlightenment (= not saved).”
I don't think Amida is saying, “I won't save what I don't believe in or what I don't believe in.” I don't think he's that narrow-minded.
I think you're probably saying, “What you believe in can be saved, but I'll save people who don't believe,” but when that happens, the question arises as to whether there really is any point in chanting “Namu Amida Buddha,” and if you can be saved whether you sing or not, why is it “good to chant Namu Amida Buddha.”
In other words
“If you don't sing Namu Amida Buddha, you can't be saved” → is Amida such a narrow-minded person?
“You can be saved even if you don't sing Namu Amida Buddha” → then why is it necessary to sing Namu Amida Buddha?
I feel like I've fallen into a dilemma called board shears.
I would like to hear the monk's opinion on this, thank you.