Questions for Buddhists Part 5

I always read the questions and answers with great interest.

I realized that my worries didn't go away when the Buddha was enlightened; I realized my afflictions. I've heard that he woke up worried. I realized that I was worried, and I was made aware of the ignorance of the cause of my worry.
Therefore, even though they were in a state of distress until Shaba's relationship ended, I think they didn't worry, worry, and suffer due to that “awareness.”
Liberation from reincarnation means awakening to “life” due to good fortune without reincarnation.

Every beginning is also luck. It all came about due to various complex causes. This is not because I “don't know,” but because of the law that it is a result caused by some cause, “I understand.” However, the cause is mysterious and beyond human knowledge. It's not “I don't know,” it's “I can't match.” “It falls short.”
Maybe this will become clear due to the development of science in the future...

Shakyamuni lived a happy life while testifying to nirvana. Then, when Shaba's relationship ended, she proved that she had a big nirvana.

There is no basis.

I just feel this way when I think about Human Shakyamuni. Also, some of my seniors said this, and I just heard it like that.

It would be nice if we could get answers from many teachers. I'm looking forward to it too.

I don't mean to make them angry, but for now, it's a good idea to try that kind of “thought” until you get bored, and think that my admonition is correct and try it.
A long time ago, that was the case for me, and as a result, I wasn't happy or at ease.
“Everything is abnormal? So what is it? SO WHAT?”
&next&next
Ask for the next one.
the flames of demand won't stop, right?
What you are doing is philosophy, not Buddhism.
It's a thought activity.
Try it out and experiment to see if the day comes when you think “Oh, I'm really happy.” (*'▽')
Do you know I'm ignoring the current cause?
That's a cause even now.
If proper causes and relationships are not added now, there will be no definite results.
When making cup ramen (is it ramen next time) you should add hot water, and if you add cider, people around the world won't be able to make something that people around the world think is delicious.
You might think that cider is good, but since the method is 3 centimeters off, I don't think it's okay.
This is probably a pure question, but do you really want to experience the peace and security that Buddhism preaches?
Or are they tempted to refute the boys because they think that my admonition is correct? I think it's better to keep an honest eye on your own desires and aspirations.
Really, whether it's an attitude of listening, learning, or listening, I think carefully about what I'm trying to say, “what kind of thing are you saying,” and if this tells you how to make it easier, it's something you can understand quickly, saying, “It's probably not the method I'm doing.”
huh? This attitude of mine is extremely bad at me, but what is wrong with it? Please think about that for a moment.
Once again, if your idea and method of argument is really, really appropriate, then you're really refreshed before asking this question here.
Somehow, contradictions remain, so let's try to catch things like “I think this way” a little more and try to absorb what we really don't want to say.
The first thing to do is catch rather than hit back.
The answer is already out. Please try again. While listening to other people's words.

Buddhism is a teaching of controlling and eliminating worries and suffering by controlling and eliminating the causes of worry and suffering.
Many people who met Buddha were able to resolve their worries and suffering.
Therefore, Buddha was admired and respected by people.
Buddha was 80 years old and passed away peacefully surrounded by his disciples.
The kings of neighboring countries also respected Buddha. That's why they weren't stuck around or executed.
Even that famous savior was executed, but rather than being executed, Buddha was respected.
Isn't it true that the level was different from the religious people and gods around there?

Buddhism goes hand in hand with specific life worries.
Window panes are not useful when drinking water, even if they are made of the same glass.
Glass cups are useful when drinking water.
I turned to the cup at the tableware store and said, “If it's glass like this, it's in my window too! You don't have to bother buying a cup like this!” That being said, it's strange.
It's important to be useful when needed.
Buddhism helps solve problems and suffering.

At the time of the previous “Ignorance that existed at the beginning of this world” or “I made this world of sharks,” I'm out of nowhere. In the first place, Kenju-sama's answer last time means “individual reincarnation revolves around ignorance,” right? Regarding “the beginning of this world,” Mr. Yoshitake, Mr. Kawaguchi, and Mr. Heart Pledge all probably wrote “I don't know” = “unrecorded” = “unborn”... Even Kenju-sama went out of his way to stick nails saying “in an extreme way.”
Nevertheless, they made up the story without permission, and it gives the impression that they are inciting because it involves oblique interpretations. Communication wasn't established at all before the counter machine theory. Isn't there no point in responding if you do something like that?

Even if it's Mr. Tange's answer
> Don't look at soba recipes (cause) eat soba (result)
Instead, it's “discussing only soba recipes (cause) soba spreads (results) and eat it at last (countermeasures).” And he said, “Since it's kneading in my head (cause), I continue to lose my mind (result), notice that kind of state of mind, and stop kneading it in my head (countermeasures).

What's more, in this question, you think “karma is bad,” right? But if you read Mr. Kawaguchi's answer to the question three years ago properly, you can understand that “there are bad businesses, and there are good businesses.” The idea that “if you're supposed to have created your own business without permission, you can be made to create a business without permission even if you attain enlightenment, isn't it?” is nonsense from the root. He is twisting other people's stories at the speed of God.

Honestly, this isn't even philosophical. Studying philosophy starts with understanding what that person thinks without bringing in any of your own opinions. However, Aborasetsu Yasha-sama skips the conversation at the stage where she understood the other person's answer as it is. Well then no matter how many dozens or hundreds of questions you ask, it just keeps popping up. Let's start by taking other people's stories straight to the point. The Buddha said. “I can explain the way to the goal. But it's up to them to decide whether the person who hears it or doesn't go that way.”

　Good evening. Nice to meet you. No, at that age, the momentum of hitting the boys with their own opinions is full of youth.
To be honest, I've only looked at it since the previous question, but I don't think I dislike it as an “experiment or pursuit of thought.” However, this kind of “twisting words” tends to be close to masturbating. I think it's a very good sense of balance (I admire) that I always look up to my predecessors (in this way).
Now, what catches me is “of the world, space, history”... whatever, but I'm assuming “the person, thing, and science that first made it.” That's a Christian idea, isn't it? “God made the world,” well, Japanese mythology also “Japan (the land) was made by God”... In Buddhism, they should have been in a position where they “don't talk about every start” (I'm surprised. OK, I thought, but then it went through).
So, at the end of the day, you might be able to go as far as “when did time begin”, a bit thrilling and exciting, and “I thought it might be amazing to me thinking about this kind of thing” (I thought a long time ago). However, in the year before last, my dream was shattered. In an encounter with a book.
That's a person named Mr. Wittgenstein. After all, “the problem with all philosophy is a misunderstanding of words (translation).” It is said that usage that ignores the origin of words looks like a philosophical problem (problem for which there is no answer). It's in Japanese, but since the question itself hasn't been established, there's no way an answer will come out. Hmm. I wonder if it was a misunderstanding... so, NAVER summary. I'll link to it. It doesn't matter “do you think like that too?”, so try it out for a moment.
http://matome.naver.jp/odai/2143976015874294601