hasunoha

I'm in trouble because I burst into tears when I try to express my opinion

I burst into tears when it becomes a place to express my own opinions.

I see women being discussed about the same concerns on Q&A sites. They have been advised that crying is not a bad thing, and that being sensitive is a good thing.

But it's a man in his 40's. It's strange to cry every time within the company, in front of customers, at PTA meetings, and it makes everyone feel extra worried.

That's why I've tried not to express conflicting opinions. When it comes to situations where I have to express my opinions, I try to talk as much as possible so as not to let my emotions run high, but even so, my face gets hot and I feel tears pouring down my eyes.

That kind of self seems to be selected for a heavy role in the PTA. It's not that I don't like PTA activities themselves, but it's very scary when I think that tears come out in situations where various opinions (complaints too) come up and my own opinions are asked...

I tried saying, “I don't have that kind of personality...”, but it was returned that “everyone around me cooperates, and there is no need to take it alone,” and I couldn't refute it beyond that.

Right now, I feel like I'll just try it, but I'm quite worried about what to do when I have a discussion with people.

How can we resolve this issue?
We look forward to working with you.

4 Zen Responses

Put your thoughts and feelings aside

A discussion is not a fight.
Expressing opinions isn't a bad thing, and if there are 100 people, they have 100 different ideas. Not everyone is the same. So if it seems like a fight to get through an opinion, or if it becomes like my own imposition, then it won't be a discussion, right?

You can put yourself in your shoes and talk about your feelings, not your feelings. It doesn't matter what people think. You don't even need to ask about your complexion. They're all different, so that's fine. If everyone is the same, there's no need for discussion, and if you know that it's a constructive place to build something better, I don't think there's any need to cry.

I'm also really bad at speaking in public.
But we have to talk during memorial services,
I have to tell you even a little bit about Buddhism,
Above all else, monks must properly proselytize, and I try to talk even a little bit about that.
I think everything is devotion, in other words, practice.
I also think it's a little better compared to, for example, 3 years ago.
You're also practicing. Try practicing at home too. Speak slowly and at your own pace.
Also, when speaking in front of many people, think that you're the only one here right now. Please approach it as if you were playing yourself speaking slowly, carefully, and proudly.

Let's come out of ourselves first.

It's just that kind of constitution.
“I have a constitution that makes me cry right away, but I'm not as sad or angry as it looks, so don't worry about it. I've always had this kind of constitution.”
Wouldn't it be easier to just come out of yourself?
If you keep them apart, you won't have to worry about “what to do if they find out.”
Or, “When I speak in public, I'm nervous and I burst into tears. Don't worry about it.” How about explaining it?

My real opponent isn't [there].

📹 “Learn from common scenes in movies” The true nature of anxiety.
The main character is dead!
“Oh My Gah!”
“The main character! Oh My Gah! (crying)”
Oh my god everyone! (crying)
However, it was actually safe.
OH, the main character was alive!
“Oooh, my baby! (hug hug)”
I thought I was completely dead until a while ago, and I burst into tears, and it made me cry.
Let's say you put off the scene where you were actually alive for about 30 minutes.
Then, during those 30 minutes, it can be said that I was in tears over the worst and saddest scenario I had anticipated.
It was actually alive. It was fine. If it's clear that you didn't take care of them, even if you were crying, it's not an actual fact, and it means that you were crying against someone with misunderstood brain information.
Now, what we should be dealing with is not the protagonist we thought was dead, but the protagonist who was actually alive now.
That's a ridiculous question,
If there is a person who thinks that the main character was alive and is still crying because they think he has died, is that a form of dealing with “which” is prioritized?
1. The main character who actually came
2 Negative Thoughts of Yourself
“Hey, I'm alive. what are you crying for. Can't you see me?”
Similarly, the most important thing in life relationships should be an actual real partner.
That actual real partner is a living person who is changing steadily in the real-time world, and it's not a two-dimensional world of self-images, data, past photos, or anything.
If someone is right in front of you right now, try calling them out.
Also, observe yourself carefully while having a conversation.
“Am I properly prepared to deal with real, real people?”
Tension, anxiety, and the mentality of being afraid of people are actually due to this.
An imaginary or fictional opponent who assumes the worst within oneself.
This is an inner image, not the person in question.
If you reread it 4 or 5 times and understand the meaning, you won't deal with the shadows within you.