Surprisingly, detailed Buddhist books have a high landmine rate. Since it's a popular genre on the author's side, “Why did you come out so excited?” It's written by a non-expert in such a different field as an expert.
Previously, an honorary professor at a certain university served as a lecturer at a monk's workshop. At that time, I said over and over again from Ursai, “Zen is an irachiobetsuden, but that kind of thing was wrong, and Buddha said the opposite,” and I said it over and over again. “Dogen Zenji says “according to the law, according to the sutras” in Shohōgenzō, but how should Zen be taken as iritsuji and Kyōgebetsuden?”
Then the professor emeritus said, “Hey, well... I've been terribly forgetful lately... what, where was it written?” and.
The professor emeritus specializes in primitive Buddhism. Did you really read the Ancestral Record of Zen?... Before that, it was written that “the monks of the Song Dynasty in China used only as an excuse to be lazy” just by reading a Zen paper by a specialist scholar. Also, the same thing is written in books like Meiji era monk lecture records.
However, scholars from the Showa era spread big lies, such as Zen in the Irritsu Monji, Kyogaibetsuden, and that Zen is the only place in Japan where boys eat meat or have funerals. I was popular when I said critical things in a loud voice like that. Regardless of the quality of the contents, it sold if you hit it out loud anyway. There was a time like that.
Now is the time when scholars who have changed generations are clearing up the negative legacies of that era. History textbooks are constantly changing, aren't they? When it comes to folklore studies (it's a bit different), Yanagita Kunio's faith is so thick that today's scholars are all so depressed.
It looks like that, so it's quite difficult... well, in the first place, Buddhism prohibits self-study in both the Southern and Hokuden...
That's why I recommend reading material written by a proper monk. Hasunoha included. Even my social answer looks like it's just a game review at first glance, but it actually explains chapter 4 of the sutra called Shushugi, the teaching of the Four Regents. It's a bit off the rails from the language of love (laughs) or something like this.
http://hasunoha.jp/questions/3160
A monk's sentence is like that. The first step is to come into contact with such sentences and acquire a Buddhist sense and direction