Kyosuke
This is Kawaguchi Hidetoshi. This is a humble answer to the question.
I am very grateful that you are continuing to learn more about Buddhism since the previous question.
Question “I want you to explain the sutras in current words in an easy-to-understand manner”
http://hasunoha.jp/questions/121
The “Book of Sutras You Can Understand Well” by Kodansha Yuki Yoshifumi, which I introduced at this time, is structured so that you can clearly understand the contents of sutras read representative of Buddhist rituals of each denomination, so if you haven't read it yet, I definitely recommend it.
This is a continuation from the humble answer from the previous article, but in Buddhist scriptures and sutras, there are also big differences in how the Buddha theory is explained and explained, so it is also necessary to proceed with understanding by classifying and explaining the religious minister.
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/教相判釈
Broadly speaking, there are two types of classifications: “unexplained” and “unsolved (unexplained),” and the former is divided as a teaching explaining the true meaning of the Buddha, and the latter is divided as a teaching that is convenient, and there are also cases where what is “justification” and “unresolved” is also divided depending on each denomination and purpose.
Furthermore, the sutras are “fingers pointing to the moon,” and the “finger” indicating “the moon” (truth/enlightenment) is compared to the scriptures, and assuming that the “moon” (truth/enlightenment) at the end of the pointer is the true Buddha's state, it is important to actually reach that state, and the sutras are sometimes interpreted as “fingers pointing to the moon” and nothing more than convenient.
Dragon Tree Master
Middle Arguments, “Observation Articles” (18th and 6th)
“All the Buddhas also hypothesize “I [have],” they also explain “there is no self (selflessness),” and they also explain “there is no self, there is no selflessness.” , (8th) “Everything is true (as it is),” “Nothing is true,” “everything is true and untrue,” and “nothing is true, nor is it true.” These are all the teachings of the Buddha.”
At first glance, this content may be thought of as indeterministic or relativism, but it shows part of the teachings of convenience taught in response to people's hesitation and suffering, and the Buddha's truth, which underlies it, can actually be thought of as an example showing that excessive language expression and deliberation will die out.
Kawaguchi Hidetoshi Gassho