It's empty. You can also understand it in line with that kind of thing.
So why was it necessary to say “there is no substance”?
I think that's important, but if I were to compare it, it would be conveyor belt sushi.
Let's say you're always looking at a plate two or three ahead and looking for a sea urchin you once ate.
However, in the meantime, other delicious salmon roe, crab, and tuna passed by, and I missed out on a precious encounter.
Rather than waiting for “the sea urchin I'm drawing in my head = it's empty because it hasn't come to reality” you don't know when it will come, “eat” what's coming to you now! That's it.
...
(Below if you like...)
If it's about conveyor belt sushi, it's not a big deal, but when this becomes driving a car, etc., things become serious, doesn't it?
...
When we experience something pleasant, that comfort lasts, and we crave that it intensifies
(This is called ton's affliction)
When people experience something unpleasant, they crave getting rid of that unpleasant thing.
(This is called gin's affliction)
Therefore, the mind does not always know how to be satisfied and is restless.
In other words, in order to stop suffering from “craving to continue or end,”
It was explained that what they are chasing is nothing but “images and words in the brain,” or that the reality is empty, such as a jumble of parts.
There are higher-level skies, but it's easy to get confused if you don't go in from all over.
The purpose of any level of understanding is to be able to accept what is happening now as it is.
The deeper your understanding, the more it helps you move away from obsessions.