Good evening. Arei Yashiki is trying out difficult content again, isn't it? Shamefully, it's something I don't really understand.
In the Otani school of Shinshu, Ryoshin Soga said, “Hozo Bosatsu is Ayoriyashiki,” so it seems that there are a certain number of people who also learn about Ayoriyashiki. I haven't stepped that far yet.
But in a book the other day
“The meaning of Daimuryojukyo from Shinran II” Fujiba Toshiki
http://samgha.shop-pro.jp/?pid=151199335
I had an opportunity to read it with interest because this was on it. Please refer to it if you like.
Well, since I don't understand the context of the book Saiki read, there are parts that I can't say anything about, but I'll think about it for a moment in my own way.
If you take the meaning of Ayai Yashiki in phonetic words, it is translated as zōshiki (zōshiki). It's a storehouse (kura) of shiki (shiki), isn't it?
It is a storehouse where the results of recognizing the target to be recognized are stored. It seems that continuity of moving from where the recognition target is recognized to the next recognition is possible by setting up Ayoriya Sachi as this recognition entity. If we don't have a cognitive subject, our perception will fall apart, but the moment after recognition is also us, right? Can it also be called “memory (under consciousness)”? In other words, in a sense, it's tentatively set up when considering our cognitive structure.
We ordinary people actually think about various things and things that are subject to recognition, but this is hesitation, and it is consciousness (consciousness) that the truth is only a representation (appearance) of consciousness (mind).
Eventually, both the target of recognition and the subject of recognition (Ayoriya sense) disappeared, and it seems that the state where the target and subject are not separated is evident.
In order for the lost average man to overcome his hesitation, it is necessary to have clues to think even while lost. It's not that Ayoriyashiki itself is fixed or substantial, and I think it was derived as an idea on the path leading to enlightenment.
> Karma is forever immortal
I don't know much about it, but this is also not a fixed or substantive content, and I think it means that it acts as a business report (effects associated with actions).
I'm sorry for the confusion due to the content I myself don't really understand, but basically, it may be a good idea to think about laws and selflessness as a principle, and look at things that are described in a fixed, substantive, and immutable way as a convenience representing a structure of hesitation.
Suddenly everything is selfless! It's empty! Well then, there aren't any islands to attach to.