Roughly 90% or more of people make mistakes in the “way to learn” when trying to learn about the sky.
When it comes to how to learn, it means using the thought mind of the left brain as a tool. think. I try to know with reason or knowledge.
The sky is a state when viewed from the factual side rather than thought; it is an effect, a law, a form, and a “factual phase” of salvation.
The quickest way to learn is not to understand, but to take a deep look at your own automatic update function and fully automatic purification effect. It can also be said that ascetic practice means doing it.
If you really want to know, if you come to the zazen session, you'll be able to learn that even hippopotamuses and gorillas like me are sure to be Gatten. If possible, I don't want you to feel like you understand it by exchanging characters like this.
This is because when “let's interpret” the sky with logic, that activity is left-brained sensibility, and it is only an activity of theory and logic within the brain that “analyzes, interprets, and understands intellectually.” It's literally a desk ❝ empty argument ❞, so that doesn't mean I've really learned the sky.
It's like a theoretical car course, and when you actually drive, you cause yourself an accident.
Unfortunately, this is not a living sky, but the SUSHI state depicted in the picture. The way to ask for it is different, isn't it? 🍣 SUSHI that is neither raw, fresh, nor edible is SUSHI 🐟. Even if you learn the sky in the same way, if you make a mistake in the first step, you will only be armed with logic, and there is no essential salvation. It's a strange analogy, but rather than being an old man who is knowledgeable and can be kind to everyone, an old man who is familiar with certain things and can be kind to everyone is probably a better person. For example. (lol)
Therefore, if you want to learn the true meaning of the sky, you should change the way you seek it from reason to reality. It's no good if you try to understand the sky by using thoughts that only try to scoop up logic here as a tool. If you understand the sky with that, then you don't need any training, right?
Even if they are Buddhist scholars, there are people who only know the logic of Buddhism, but no matter how long it has passed, salvation or effect does not occur, so I'm afraid. It's probably like a person who likes literature only in theory without going in the direction of salvation when studying Buddhism becomes addicted to the literary euphoria of literature.
If you want to learn about the sky and be saved, or if you want to be taught by others, I recommend sanzen, a method of clarifying on your own.