Please tell me about the Heart Sutra
I've been copying sutras for memorial services since my son passed away. It just so happens that they have a shakyo session at a nearby temple, so I participate there on a monthly basis.
I'm copying the sutras while looking at the paper with the reading and translation of the Heart Sutra written on it, but I feel like the Heart Sutra is a living person, and I feel that there is a gap in the purpose of copying the sutras “for the deceased.”
〇Since it's a thankful sutra, will it be a memorial service regardless of the content?
〇 The way I receive it is different, and it doesn't mean “I will do a memorial service,” but “the deceased will accept the sutra itself,” so there's no doubt about that?
〇Can the question be solved if I could understand the Heart Sutra more simply due to lack of study?
It's like if you acknowledge that something painful is painful, neither the suffering nor its cause will go away... but that is also a sense of incongruity.
There is no such thing as suffering while trying to escape old age or death, but admitting that you have lost an important person is painful, and the cause is not going away.
I started going to the temple for about a year and a half, and when I sat in front of the Buddha, I couldn't stop crying, but I was able to put up with crying outside of my home, probably because little by little I was healed by the Buddha.
Is that because I was able to acknowledge my suffering?
There are a lot of questions I want to ask the chief priest when I visit a temple, but even if I can make small talk, it's likely that if I talk about this kind of thing, I'll cry again and won't be able to speak, so I asked the question here.
It seems like there is still more need for daily medicine.
Thank you for your support.
