Thank you for your incisive question.
Certainly, in Buddhism, people are sometimes told to “go back to yourself” and “don't seek the cause only from others or the environment.”
But cutting just that out is misleading.
There is such a word.
“After all, the Buddha, for whatever reason, lies down on his side and dies 80 years later, between the two trees in Kushina-jo Castle.”
“If the Buddha is perfect, why did Buddha get sick and die at the age of eighty?”
The founder of Zen asked this question.
In other words, just because you have attained enlightenment does not mean that actual suffering or death from old age sickness will go away.
Therefore, the suffering of children receiving DV is by no means a delusion.
The cause is clearly violence.
Getting away from it and being protected is a priority above all else.
Don't settle real-life problems by “having a heart.”
On the other hand, what Buddhism preaches is a way of life where the heart is not continuously controlled by that suffering.
There are two sides to the event.
One is that we have to solve real problems.
Another thing is that we don't keep our hearts bound by that problem.
As long as you survive in this Shaba world, sometimes it becomes a fight, it becomes a trial, and there are situations where you have to fight.
The idiot himself is in the midst of just that.
That's why I think.
There is a difference between fighting and being controlled by hate.
We aim to solve problems in reality.
However, at the root of my heart, I am not controlled by that event until my life.
I accept that this may be one meaning of the Buddhist teaching that “suffering is created by the mind.”
It's not about running away from reality, nor is it just about being held captive by reality.
I think walking while staring at both is Buddhism.
We clasped hands.